Scientific American and FALSE NEWS!

Scientific American and FALSE NEWS!

4491DC88-6714-4A20-AEA3297606E561C1_sourceNow as president, he has signed executive orders that restrict entry of immigrants from seven countries into the U.S. and authorize the construction of a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. He also signed an order to prioritize the removal of “criminal aliens” and withhold federal funding from “sanctuary cities.”

Which in my learned opinion is what he should do! Those seeking to deny the mayhem caused by MS 13 are clearly mistaken. Moreover, a simple read of just about any day’s newspaper would declare this conversation by Scientific American false.

Look at this problem from the traffic angle. There are traffic accidents daily in every C6F96EF7-D145-45BB-9CEB8B20F23C0A4A_mediumauthority of sanctuary cities. Pick up a gun, fire it into a person’s head and kill her, then walk out of court scot-free in San Francisco California only shows me that where and when these researchers are getting their source material is false.

The clear travesty behind this “groundbreaking theory analysis” is it is obvious when doing this type of research, it is imperative that researchers compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges. This was not the criteria of the research or the hypothesis that went into it.

In my opening statement, actually given by President Trump after his victorious and history-making triumph in the election from a quote in Scientific American stated in its entirety,

“They are being released by the tens of thousands into our communities with no regard for the impact on public safety or resources…We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities.”

But as far as reporting goes, that message is good enough for a headline – which the did appear to receive their proportion. But this is not apples to apples. It does not take a rocket scientist to read President Trump’s statement and see that there is a word that makes this research qualify for an immigrant to immigrant only. The problem with Scientific American’s research is again in the hypothesis and what is being compared.

C86D0878-243C-45B8-95F536F86CBB5240_mediumIf legal immigrants to legal immigrants are the ones being studied here, then it makes perfectly good sense predicated upon their findings. However, that is not what our president is doing that has had him underscored since the Obama administration with his created loopholes.

In typical Democrat protocol, Scientific American used a scheme for headlines hoping to find a person or people out there that would buy into this oxymoron.  Which is why I’m writing about it. President Trump is talking about the 12 million ILLEGAL ALIENS that have happened upon our nation’s soil. Now, if Scientific American wanted to compare entities they would be comparing illegal immigrants to illegal immigrants they have all broken the law just by being here. Furthermore, they would be examining the impact on public safety and resources, violence, and drugs brought into America by gang members.

So, it would be far more effective for Scientific American to stop their headline debacle and stick to the facts.


Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Scientific American and FALSE NEWS!

Feedback or your comments regarding the current Caravan

Feedback or your comments regarding the current Caravan


GettyImages-632708222-588a63cd5f9b5874ee23b9e9Let’s be reasonable, here shall we? What type of “rule of law” or immigration policy can be deduced from the latest goings on with this caravan of people from Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, and of course, some regions from the Middle East?

Recently, in a startling bit of news it was announced, “In a startling revelation, Guatemala’s President announced that ~100 ISIS terrorists have been apprehended in the Central American nation. But why should Americans care about this? A caravan of Central American migrants is currently making its way north.”

Okay then, what are our responses? First, allow me to ask you, are all of you reading for this type of immigration or assimilation or integration? Now then, it is apparently coming from the Democrat Party who is leading the way as far as borders or not to have them; as well as, federally mandated health care; and consequently, the makings of Socialism in our nation.

Normally, I would be eager to write how far fledged is this rubbish and how far is it going to continue to go on? Then I heard the Democrat nominee for the US Senate state that it was okay for any American to suit up with the Taliban and hence go to war against the US soldiers who are in Afghanistan. It was at that precise moment that I must get involved.                  global-food-crisis-1__thumb

So how do I get involved? Number one is the mid-term vote. I have perused my temporary ballot and in Maryland, it is Democrat, Democrat, democrat and on and on. Yep you betcha, my Congressional representative for the 7th Congressional District of Maryland is up for re-election. No! I will not be voting for him. He’s very racist, very Democrat, and appears to be without his wits.

Number two, I need to write for me and to help you understand. Democrats seem to care for everything I am against. Therefore, a little assistance with their party’s beliefs as well as their individual beliefs but where do I start? Nancy Pelosi? How about Elizabeth Warren? (Please see article below.)

I am for America and the rule of law that she portends to represent. If you do not have the appropriate paperwork from Homeland Security or the State Department concerning immigration, turn around and go home. There will be no special circumstances, loopholes in the law or anything else for you. So, how did you enjoy your walk?


Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Feedback or your comments regarding the current Caravan

Thank you, Judicial Watch!

Thank you, Judicial Watch!

I am an avid subscriber, listener, donator, and member of the most effective watchdog group in our nation, and I don’t mind admitting it. Judicial Watch performs with such impunity making sure that every i is dotted and every t is crossed.

I can still remember the day some eleven years ago that I ran into my first post from Judicial Watch and have been hooked, nah! Addicted for years now. I would never think to take anything away from what this organization comes up with – my challenges come from working on their projects.

But I also don’t mind admitting that with a tiny, minuscule, lead and rolling up the sleeves to get to work and make no mistake about it – this organization still has many to thank and yet, many more owe their thanksgiving to J.W.

Freedom of Information Act, I first heard of it during Mr. Mark Lane’s investigation into JFK mayhem, then J.W. has darn near perfected the act that truly calls for public knowledge. So, for those of you in the know, assist, help, and encourage the real heroes at Judicial Watch.

Tonight, from Twitter, “In a startling revelation, Guatemala’s President announced that ~100 ISIS terrorists have been apprehended in the Central American nation. But why should Americans care about this? A caravan of Central American migrants is currently making its way north.”

Sounds like something we all should get up and get behind.



Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Thank you, Judicial Watch!

Simply does not make Sense

Simply does not make Sense

One doesn’t even have to be old-fashioned anymore. Believing in the sanctity of sovereignty or plainly having respect for our own border, taking pride in being an American, and willing to do what it costs to remain a sovereign nation is what is important. Funny how the “Hollyweird” people have not stepped up their rhetoric of late.

GutamalaThe Associated Press reported today, along with yours truly, “Hondurans fleeing poverty and violence, rest before moving in a caravan toward the United States, outside a bus station.

More than 64 percent of Honduran households live in poverty, and San Pedro Sula has one of the world’s highest murder rates.”

Okay, some nations are considered “third world.” And unfortunately, this is one of the criteria. Having a failing economy, people working for fewer wages than what it takes to live on, indeed are signs of poverty. But let’s not forget that third world nations also have politicians and governments. Moreover, let’s not forget that this way of living is not discriminatory, or deliberately attacking the members of those societies.

Therefore, what I am promoting is that this does not warrant new rules and policy on refugees. There is not one single bit of evidence that these people are being religious, politics, or discriminated against for this to evolve into asylum seeking. Both President’s Obama and Trump alongside were very responsible for establishing this office of US State Department’s new program of calling  border jumpers and those who end up here illegally under The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) is one of the State Department’s “functional,” as opposed to “geographic” bureaus.­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

It is important to remember our defined leaderships declaration of 1951, that clearly states; According to the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention, a refugee is defined as someone who “owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country…”

Therefore, we are all interested in assisting the third world nation’s economic status, but hey, let’s not be giving entitlements to induce people to walk or ride buses to America. Now by allowing this newly formed project, The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) in cohorts with The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) funds the work of these other international organizations as well as non-governmental organizations to respond to IDP needs as well. I think we’ve all taken issue with $90 million dollars of USAID funds being used in Afghanistan right now as I type.


Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Simply does not make Sense

Sexual Harassment versus Assault

Sexual Harassment versus Assault

th (12)Harvey Weinstein. Louis C.K., Roy Moore, President William Clinton. The list of prominent men admitting to or being accused of sexual harassment seems to grow longer each day. But what exactly is the legal definition of sexual harassment? Please, I implore you or those interested to see the Top 200 prominent men involved and of course, women too. Just click here.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the government agency that enforces discrimination laws, says, “It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include ‘sexual harassment’ or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.”

The U.S. courts recognize two types of sexual harassment in the workplace: quid pro quo harassment and a hostile or abusive work environment.

Quid pro quo harassment is a sexual favor as a term or condition of employment. (The Latin term literally means “this for that.”) A good example is actress Dawn Dunning’s allegation that Harvey Weinstein invited her to his hotel suite, showed her contracts for his next three films but said she could only sign them if she agreed to have three-way sex with him. Prior to all the recent headlines, this type of sexual harassment was believed to be in decline, notes Merrick “Rick” Rossein, an employment law professor at the City University of New York Law School.

494324463 - CopyTo qualify as quid pro quo, a harasser must have the power to influence the professional treatment of the victim, such as whether she’s hired, promoted or receives a salary increase. “If proven, the employer is always liable, even if they had a policy against asking for sex in the workplace,” Rossein says. The favor doesn’t always have to be explicit. It can be hinted at through words or gestures (touch).

Continue reading

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Sexual Harassment versus Assault

Warren, not much about genealogy, alas.

Not much about genealogy, alas.

Donald Trump’s most obvious superpower is his lack of shame, which permits him to do things that ordinary politicians would never dare or survive. But perhaps his real gift is his ability to cause his opponents to beclown themselves.

download (1)So today, baited by Trump’s gibes, Elizabeth Warren rushes headlong into self-parody with a lavish rollout of a DNA test that suggests that she may be (checks notes) 1/1,024 Native American. The DNA test, notable for its imprecision, suggests that Warren may have a Native American ancestor somewhere “in the range of 6-10 generations ago.” (Which reminds me that I have an ancestry report around here somewhere suggesting that in addition to my Russian Jewish ancestors, I am also descended from Scottish kings.)

Despite the media hype, the new data seems unlikely to resolve the questions about Warren’s ancestry, even as it opens vast new territory for ridicule. More substantively, she exposes the unutterable silliness of the politics of diversity, at least as it practiced in the Ivy League. Her timing is especially awkward, given it comes on the same day that a trial begins in federal court exploring Harvard’s use of race in admissions.
The Boston Globe reminds us why this matters:

During her academic career as a law professor, she had her ethnicity changed from white to Native American at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she taught from 1987 to 1995, and at Harvard University Law School, where she was a tenured faculty member starting in 1995.

There’s no evidence this had any practical impact on her academic career, but the gods of diversity were appeased and just sickened.

The political fallout has been less benign. Having fully exploited the “birther” conspiracy theories about Barack Obama for political advantage, Trump is obviously partial to using questions about racial identity and ancestry as cudgels. So not surprisingly, has behaved with typical Trumpian crassness on the subject, mocking Warren as “Pocahontas,” and telling Fox News last week: “She can’t prove anything… You know what? I have more Indian blood in me than she does. I have none, unfortunately. I have none.”

The mockery and the challenge have clearly gotten into Warren’s head and since she is running for president, she felt compelled to engage with Trump, if only to show that unlike Hillary Clinton, she knows how to fight back. So now we get the Elizabeth Warren DNA show, complete with a slickly produced video. And we are all about to get dumber for it.

The inherent imprecision of the six-page DNA analysis could provide fodder for Warren’s critics. If her great-great-great-grandmother was Native American, that puts her at 1/32nd American Indian. But the report includes the possibility that she’s just 1/1,024th Native American if the ancestor is 10 generations back.

The analysis was done by Stanford Professor Carlos D. Bustamante, a former winner of the MacArthur genius grant for his work on DNA. But he notes the limitations on a study of this sort.

To make up for the dearth of Native American DNA, Bustamante used samples from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia to stand in for Native American. That’s because scientists believe that the groups Americans refer to as Native American came to this land via the Bering Strait about 12,000 years ago and settled in what’s now America but also migrated further south. His report explained that the use of reference populations whose genetic material has been fully sequenced was designed “for maximal accuracy.”

Bustamante’s analysis suggests that somewhere, someplace there are traces of Native American ancestry. Warren, he concluded, “has 12 times more Native American blood than a white person from Great Britain and 10 times more than a white person from Utah, the report found.”


Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Warren, not much about genealogy, alas.

She’ll sink herself

She’ll sink herself

Clinton-Email-ScandalIf you have been wondering what kind or type of agenda the Democrats have been working on during their prestigious stay as “Congressional members” just have a slight read of what their leadership has been discussing with one of the world’s most renown reporters, MS Christiane Amanpour.

If you are like me, you’d be praying for the brilliant notion of a two-house system that can keep an eye or hear akin to the judicial system who in turn should be watching both of those two as well as the executive branch. That is precisely what separation of powers means, backed-up by the automatic job description of each other performing a system of checks and balances on the other branches of government.

Why would the Republican Party try to destroy the Democrats who are in office when if you asked any person living in the nation, the Democrat Party is destroying itself. Hum, not a lot to think about there.

Furthermore, I have no doubt at all stating that I pray, mostly since Donald Trump was elected President, I have been engaged in praying for border protection, illegal immigration protection, and that we could pledge at least two Democrats to something that our President and Commander-in-Chief has put his entire Cabinet on.

For instance, a good example of this would be the infamous, “Iran Plan.” This plan as we all well know was just a bit of paperwork performed by our previous presidential administration. It went something like “hey how about $1.4 Billion dollars cash in your hand and remember my friend Hillary, Mrs. Clinton, is still trying to mop-up some odd 83 percent of the world’s plutonium for you.”               nukeem

Recall if you will the Treaty signed in 1955 of Amity with Iran. The agreement was written with the intent of “emphasizing the friendly relations which have long prevailed between [the peoples of the United States and Iran],” the statement said. It also expressly encouraged mutually beneficial trade and positive economic and consular relations when it was enacted, which we know now is ridiculous.

Someone out there explain to me what the Democrats are doing beside fixing and muttering with the FBI, US Supreme Court, and respecting the civil rights of a person who denies everything that doesn’t have an evidence tag affixed to it.

Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that civility in America can only begin again if Democrats win back the House or Senate this fall.

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton said in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. “That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize, and respect is strength.”

Clinton alluded to previous controversies — like the 2000 election recount to the “swift boat” attacks against John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election to the confirmation of Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh — as evidence of what she sees as hardball tactics by Republicans.

“I remember what they did to me for 25 years — the falsehoods, the lies, which unfortunately people believe because the Republicans have put a lot of time, money, and effort in promoting them,” Clinton said. “So, when you’re dealing with an ideological party that is driven by the lust for power, that is funded by corporate interests who want a government that does its bidding, it’s — you can be civil, but you can’t overcome what they intend to do unless you win elections.”

DpI_5r4UUAA9aAzThis has been the Democratic Party platform since she’s been involved. Clinton said a top priority of a Democratic House and Senate should be to scrutinize President Donald Trump. Asked if Democrats should impeach Trump, Clinton sidestepped.

“The question about impeachment — you know, that will be left to others to decide,” Clinton said. “I want to stop the degrading of the rule of law. The delegitimizing of elections. One of their priorities should be, let’s protect our elections. Let’s make sure that we have electoral security. Let’s end the suppression of voters. So, there is a big agenda if the Democrats take over.”

Mrs. Clinton does not have a right in telling anyone about electoral security; moreover, if she would admit the sentence, “I want to stop the degrading of the rule of law,” then she would STOP scrubbing her discs, STOP destroying all of her illegal email traffic, and just one more item, she is the person who the former director of the FBI pardoned in a very illegal way.





Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on She’ll sink herself

Australia using a “little” sense

Australia to Ban Migrants from Sydney or Melbourne


Perth, Australia

Australia is planning to ban new migrants from living in Sydney or Melbourne in an effort to counter surging population growth in the country’s two largest cities and alleviate pressure on schools, healthcare, roads, public transport, and housing.

Thousands of Britons, Australia’s third biggest source of new arrivals, will be affected by the change, which is likely to be introduced in the new year.

They would be “allocated” to a smaller town or city in their adopted country, where they would have to spend up to five years in an attempt also to rebalance growth towards places that are suffering population stagnation or decline.

Under the plan, presented by Alan Tudge, the population minister, the government intends to impose visa conditions on tens of thousands of migrants requiring them to settle outside the two big cities for up to five years.

About 150,000 permanent migrants deemed to have skills that Australia needs are admitted each year. That includes about 17,000 Britons as well as many Chinese and Indians.

New migrants overwhelmingly choose to settle in the Melbourne and Sydney, pushing population growth to twice the estimates made a decade ago. The unplanned nature of the migrant arrivals is costing £13.5 billion in lost economic activity because of congestion and overloaded infrastructure, according to the government.

While the government has yet to spell out where it will force migrants to live, Adelaide, Perth, Darwin, and Canberra are among the likely destinations.

Although net migration now accounts for 60 percent of Australia’s population growth nationally, it accounts for 84 percent in Sydney, Australia’s largest city with 5.4 million inhabitants. Melbourne, which has 4.8 million people, and southeast Queensland, including Brisbane, with two million, are also struggling with billowing population growth.

“What we’re trying to do is get a better distribution of that [migration] growth so it can help some of those smaller states and some of the regional areas, which are crying out for more people, and take a bit of that congestion pressure off,” Mr. Tudge told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

He indicated that the government planned to enforce the policy by making it a condition of entry that migrants live and work where they are told for their first years. That could be enforced by the revocation of the visa or denying newcomers the right to apply for citizenship if they breach location restrictions.

“Nearly every visa has conditions attached to it so it wouldn’t be unusual to have a geographic attachment to a particular visa,” Mr. Tudge said.

About half the migrants admitted to Australia because of their skills are sponsored by particular employers and live where their employers are located. Mr. Tudge said that the new policy would not affect these skilled people but that it would be applied to those not tied to an employer.



Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Australia using a “little” sense

Rose McGowan slams the #MeToo movement:

Rose McGowan slams the #MeToo movement: ‘It’s all bull’

RoseRose McGowan, one of the most vocal advocates of the #MeToo movement, now says the revolutionary reckoning that swept through Hollywood the past year is “bull.”

McGowan, 45, helped spark the movement last fall by going on the record with sexual assault allegations against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. The actress said Weinstein raped her in a hotel room in 1997 and blacklisted her career.

But days after the #MeToo movement’s first anniversary, the “Scream” actress said Hollywood’s battle against sexual assault in the entertainment industry is only skin-deep.

“It’s a lie. It’s a Band-Aid lie to make them feel better,” McGowan said during an interview with The Sunday Times in the U.K. “I know these people, I know they’re lily-livered, and as long as it looks good on the surface, to them, that’s enough.”

McGowan claimed she was shunned by the #MeToo community, frequently left out of the survivors’ brunches and campaign lunches, despite being one of the most outspoken members.

“I just think they’re douchebags. They’re not champions. I just think they’re losers. I don’t like them,” she said. “How do I explain the fact that I got a GQ Man of the Year award and no women’s magazines and no women’s organizations have supported me?”

The “Charmed” alum vowed to never work in Hollywood again, adding that although she doesn’t agree with President Donald Trump’s politics, she does share something in common with his supporters.

“They hate Hollywood for being faux liberals – and they’re 100 percent right about that. It’s a bunch of faux liberals,” McGowan said. “It’s crap, and they know it is deep down, but they’re living an empty life, and to me, that’s their punishment. They get to live the lives they live.”

McGowan doubled down on past criticism of Meryl Streep, calling it “literally impossible” for the Oscar-winning actress to be completely in the dark on Weinstein’s predatory behavior.

The actress also renounced support of Hillary Clinton for the same reason.

On Twitter Wednesday, McGowan marked one year since coming forward with allegations against Weinstein on Twitter: “Today marks the anniversary of one of the hardest years of my life. It’s been a year of triggering for so many. I’m proud of us.”



Suggested reading for more value: Click here!

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Rose McGowan slams the #MeToo movement:

Move on America…

Move on America…

Democrats dummysOkay, now is it time to move on with our nation? What I am referring to is this constant notion of “obstructionism.” As I see it when something doesn’t go the Democrat Party’s way, well then, let’s just get paid and not do our job. There are matters to look at here, and I mean very important matters!

Recently, I wrote a series of articles on females and their new movement, the #MeToo Movement. Now before any female gets up and stops reading, I was with you and to this day I still am. However, I still believe that ladies or women who exploit their tremendous assets to move ahead albeit for job advancement, relational activities, or otherwise should not look to this movement and start crying me too!

Basically, what I mean is that the “Movement” should be used for the number one category that was explained to me as sexual assault. I believe then, as I do now, that any male that uses his strength and prowess – hell, even his wealth or prosperity – to inflict pain, harm, conflict, or any sexual maneuver without the consent of a woman as long as there is due process, should be made to suffer in any and all ways that will work given the nature of the man (explanation follows).

Mind you, if a woman is in a position by way of common sense, decency, or otherwise, that allows a man to use his strength and/or his position in any industry may indeed assume consequences that she did not want.

hanging-cage-420x279I will speak for the men of Hollyweird on a limited basis insofar as I have been in both sectors or assisted in representing those who have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. I believe that a woman being considered for a part in a film, play, or anything that will bring her prominence should be above board with even contact and conduct. Take for example, Mr. Weinstein, who either himself, his brother, or his great-grandpa, grandpa, father, or mother owns a considerable amount of the studios and their affiliates, including the best films, television, or even Broadway, any woman under the influence of this kind of man should be using extra caution.

Time for the curveball. What happens when a woman deliberately uses a “date rape” drug on a man, yet, still the man does not desire her in any sexual way. Then for no reason whatsoever, the male comes home from work and finds an eviction notice on his door? Then in the relaxing atmosphere of the hot tub, this female wears only a robe and when she decides to go into the easing water, removes her robe, and in her splendid regalia starts screaming rape while she hurls herself on to the male! The police are called on 9-1-1, incidentally by the male and she starts crying and lying and more lying.

Later in the evening, the police show up at the male’s door threatening with a warrant! As the male identifies himself as indeed the person who made the call and had been sitting and waiting for the police to show up then, there were some embarrassed officers! The man explained he’d hired a motion picture cameraman who had filmed the entire event. Furthermore, the male explained that there was no reason for him to be evicted. This soon panned out to be true – because the woman used an accounting error to make the male look as though he forwent his lease. Once corrected, the precise same night, the police refused to take the woman into custody!

This example is as much possible and probable as Dr. J. Blasey Ford’s claim against Brett Kavanaugh with the exception that she did not possess any direct form of evidence – no police report from 1982, she did absolutely nothing with regards to her situation which for the life of me became her largest significant problem. To be as open as possible, one would think (in the teenage mindset) that this person may have provided a way to enact sexual activity. She certainly would have carried a brand, because she did not do anything before, during, or especially after the event.

This story is to illustrate that matters happen all the time. Sometimes the police make arrests when they are supposed to. And at other times they do not. This is not an article on law enforcement protocol. It is, however, an article to bring into view that everything that happens – criminally – needs appropriate due diligence in the form of due process rights.


Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Move on America…