Founding Father’s Friday — House of Representatives

The western front of the United States Capitol... The United States House of Representatives is one of the two Houses of the United States Congress, the bicameral legislature which also includes the Senate.

The composition and powers of the House are established in Article One of the Constitution. The major power of the House is to pass federal legislation that affects the entire country although its bills must also be passed by the Senate and further agreed to by the President before becoming law (unless both the House and Senate re-pass the legislation with a two-thirds majority in each chamber).

Unfortunately for many concerned and conscientious Americans it is the personal and political aspirations of the members that create gridlock or lame duck sessions. If the
president wants Congress to work with him on various projects – under normal circumstances he is asking for congress to get some money allocated for his project (House) as well as make sure all due-process is correct (Senate) so that this neat little package with various stipulations arrives back at the president’s desk for his signature and hence, law.

The fortunate side of this process is the matter of checks and balances within the various branches. Let’s hypothesize that the president was asking for something completely ridiculous, and this does happen! Moreover, in our hypothetical let’s say that the political party the president is aligned with has more members in the legislature – Congress – and for good or bad every person elected for two years (House representative) wants to support the president; however, after doing the due-diligence the various big wigs find that the president’s plan is so bogus that it would be criminal to support it.

We are of the opinion that humankind during the 1800s were far less than in 2009 to support something like universal healthcare regardless of how much money they were offered or what the federal government would do for your state.

Each state receives representation in the House in proportion to its population but is entitled to at least one representative. The most populous state, California, currently has 53 representatives. The total number of voting representatives is fixed by law at 435. Each representative serves for a two-year term. The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, traditionally the leader of the majority party is the presiding officer of the chamber, elected by the members of the House.

The Constitution grants the House several exclusive powers: the power to initiate revenue bills, to impeach officials, and to elect the President in case of an Electoral College deadlock. The House meets in the south wing of the United States Capitol, with the Senate meeting in the north wing of the same building.

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was a unicameral body in which each state held one vote. After eight years of a more limited federal government under the Articles, numerous political leaders, such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, initiated the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which received the Confederation Congress’s permission to “amend the Articles of Confederation.” All states except Rhode Island agreed to send delegates.

The issue of how Congress was to be structured was one of the most divisive among the founders during the Convention. Edmund Randolph’s Virginia Plan called for a bicameral Congress: the lower house would be “of the people,” elected directly by the people of the United States and representing public opinion, and a more deliberative upper house that would represent the individual states, and would be less susceptible to variations of mass sentiment, would be elected by the lower house.

The House is referred to as the lower house, with the Senate being the upper house, although the United States Constitution does not use that terminology. Both houses’ approval is necessary for the passage  of smaller legislation. The Virginia Plan drew the support of delegates from large states such as Virginia, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, as it called for representation based on population.

Eventually, the Convention reached the Connecticut Compromise, or the Great Compromise, under which one house of Congress (the House of Representatives) would provide representation proportional to each state’s population, whereas the other (the Senate) would provide equal representation amongst the states. The Constitution was ratified by the requisite number of states (nine out of the 13) in 1788, but its implementation was set for March 4, 1789. The House began work on April 1, 1789, when it achieved a quorum for the first time.states, however, favored the New Jersey Plan, which called for a unicameral Congress with equal representation for the states.

About J.Paul

Academia, Constitution, Musicianship, all around Caucasian male, straight, and professes Jesus Christ as the Lord of my life. Guitars -- Classical, Acoustic, A/E, Strat, a real bassist at heart, Les Paul Standard bass.
This entry was posted in American History, Crime, Illegal Immigration,, Politics, Special Interest Groups and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Founding Father’s Friday — House of Representatives

  1. Pingback: (“The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible”) Progressivism: The purpose of colleges it to indoctrinate and manipulate

  2. Pingback: Anonymous

    • Jon-Paul says:

      Hey Gunny G!!:

      So nice to see your comments of today; moreover, we believe that there is a reasonable, yet, perhaps a moot point regarding your comment’s question.

      So who were the “We the People” and of course having the advantage of seeing and reading, I went to your site and to edrivera.com to have a read.

      It sure is an interesting notion with whom you perceive as the identity of who “We the People” are. Hey gang, I would love to answer this one for you, however, a quick visit to Gunny’s excellent site poses a pretty strong case of who they may be; notwithstanding however, most of us have seen this question from time to time and it does have MERIT.

      However, as for me and the grunts here at The Thinker, we respond diplomatically with: Sure it may indeed have been those “55-Men at Philadelphia” however, when one reads the private journals and papers of those who were in support of those men (literally thousands) as well as what the Constitution was purporting as far as self-rule, representative democracy, and the ‘unusual experiment’ in governance we believe in our hearts that “We the People” is actually for everyone who was a legal citizen of the U.S.A. especially for the future.

      Again we thank Gunny G. for making all of us use our heads with critical thought. Cheers!

      Like

  3. rich says:

    and who came up with that system of two houses, one by population and one by equal number? ben franklin.

    Like

    • Jon-Paul says:

      Are you sure about that?

      Like

      • rich says:

        it’s what i read. jefferson was torn between the two houses when writing the constitution. he was entrusted to pick one, and franklin suggested both.

        Like

        • Jon-Paul says:

          Hey Rich: Upon further and extensive review our primary source documents reveal that the bicameral issue plagued or bothered James Madison the most. He actually showed up at the Convention approximately 5 to 6 days earlier than the others so that he could work out talking points for developing stronger debates. In as much as Thomas Jefferson was the Ambassador to France, he wasn’t in the United States at the time of writing the U.S. Constitution. He was however consulted from time to time but truthfully Jefferson had very little to do with the Convention and the drafting of the Constitution. See original writing re: the Connecticut Plan or Great Compromise.

          Like

          • rich says:

            don’t need to see it. i’m speaking based on a biography of franklin, and – believe it or not – a presentation in the american pavilion in epcot center down in disneyworld. i can’t imagine them being wrong, but i won’t tell you that you’re wrong either.

            Like

          • Jon-Paul says:

            I have always found that, in my experience, it usually is the best thing not to refute one’s particular knowledge of history. I believe it is just good form; moreover, who are we to say anything unless we have the primary source documents before us? Good call!

            Like

          • rich says:

            in a word – yup.

            Like

Comments are closed.