Tehran’s threat to block crude shipments through the crucial passage for Middle Eastern suppliers followed the European Union’s decision to tighten sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, as well as accompanying moves by the United States to tighten unilateral sanctions.
Iran’s English-language Press TV quoted Hossein Salami as saying: “Any threat will be responded by threat … We will not relinquish our strategic moves if Iran’s vital interests are undermined by any means.”
What does threat responded to by threat mean anyway? Unless we have missed something – we do not believe that the United States or any of its allied partners have threatened or stated anything about Iran’s alleged strategic moves; moreover, the talk of Iranian vital interests being undermined is just plain grandstanding.
This seems to be either a press spokesman or somebody’s lap dog with that kind of undisciplined intelligence.
The U.S. Fifth Fleet said on Wednesday it would not allow any disruption of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, a strip of water separating Oman and Iran.
At loggerheads with the West over its nuclear program, Iran said earlier it would stop the flow of oil through the strait in the Gulf if sanctions were imposed on its crude exports.
Analysts say that Iran could potentially cause havoc in the Strait of Hormuz which connects the biggest Gulf oil producers, including Saudi Arabia, with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. At its narrowest point, it is 21 miles across.
Essentially therefore all of this trash talking going on by the Iranian’s simply shows what kind of government that soon enough the entire world will be dealing with.