Obama…Blamer-in Chief

Obama…blamer-in chief

Barack Obama has become America’s blamer-in-chief. He and his administration spent last weekend blaming the explosion of violence against America in the Middle East on a moronic anti-Muhammad video that’s been on YouTube for months.

His United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice made the rounds of the Sunday morning news shows, where she made an absolute idiot of herself. How many times is this false leader going to continue to lie to you, me, and the American people?

President Barack Obama definitely walks by the beat of a different drummer – the saddest notion behind all of it is this: If things don’t go his way, then wait a few days, and each one of his political lies will change at someone’s expense.

Apparently auditioning for the secretary of state job in — God forbid — a second Obama administration, Rice insisted that the “spontaneous” Islamic rage that killed our ambassador in Libya and three other Americans was caused not by the failures of her boss but by an amateur movie made by some nut in California.

This tragic episode once again proves that the incompetence of this president is not limited to the home front, where the economy stagnates and deficits and gas prices soar.

In the Middle East, Obama and his Chicago Gang have confused our friends and emboldened our enemies with a foreign policy that has been a mix of ineptness, appeasement, and naiveté.

Remember when Obama boasted in Cairo that the Muslim world was going to fall in love with the USA because it had just elected a president who had generations of Muslims in his ancestry?
Boy, the Muslims in Libya and Egypt sure have a strange way of showing their love for America.

Obama’s cowering reaction to the Middle East crisis — and his refusal to man-up and act like the president of the United States — begs the question: “What would Ronald Reagan do?” When the Marine barracks were blown up in Lebanon in 1983, Ronald Reagan didn’t blame it on anyone else.

He accepted responsibility for the Marines dying. But he also used the event to come on TV and talk to the American people and explain why it was so important for us to be in the Middle East.

What did this president do when our invaluable Libyan ambassador Chris Stevens was assassinated in a well-planned attack by Muslim extremists? He went to Vegas for a fundraiser event and made another political speech.

Being president of the United States is not about being a good guy to play hoops with, or to have a cold beer with — it’s about being able to take a position of leadership when trouble comes.
It means standing up for American values like the freedom of speech, not apologizing for them. And it means standing up for our policies in the Middle East, not throwing them overboard whenever they are challenged.

President Obama is a glaring sign of the absolute weakening of America. You might call what he has been doing “The Wussification of the White House.”

Mr. President, when trouble came our way, we soldiers manned up. It’s time for you to do the same. “Let’s roll.”

Get a load of this…Rubbish!

Get a load of this… More than a decade after he was captured in Afghanistan, John Walker Lindh, the so-called “American Taliban,” was in a federal court in Indiana this week seeking not his release from a federal prison in Terre Haute but the right to pray with fellow Muslim inmates several times a day. Lindh makes a plausible case that the facility is needlessly restricting his rights under federal law. (Ahem!)

For the record, we do not believe that Lindh’s “rights” under federal law are being abridged or otherwise by his predicament in Club Fed in Indiana. Lindh, a teenage convert to Islam who joined the Taliban before Sept. 11, 2001, and is reported as never waged war against Americans. However, he was apprehended on a battlefield  during a fire-fight with the enemy. In other words he was captured as an enemy combatant.

Yet he was sentenced to 20 years in prison for violating a Clinton-era presidential order that prohibits providing “services” to the Taliban. Even if Lindh’s sentence weren’t excessive — and there will always be those who believe it was — he has the right to practice his religion. Under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act the law provides that the government shall not “substantially burden” a person’s exercise of religion unless it demonstrates that doing so furthers a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.

Gee, we wonder if Elaine and Jon Huguenin’s counsel in New Mexico have considered the same perspective. Seriously we wonder what “government interest” was at stake, and has the authorities in New Mexico operated under the least restrictive circumstances? We think not.

The Communications Management Unit that houses Lindh does allow Muslim prisoners to meet for prayer every Friday and more often during Ramadan. But, citing security concerns (and the possibility that frequent Muslim prayers would mean fewer resources to accommodate other religions), the prison administration will not allow the inmates to pray in groups several times a day. The notion that group prayers would be uniquely dangerous is difficult to credit given that they may engage in other activities outside their cells between 6 a.m. and 9:15 p.m., including conversing, snacking, playing board games, watching television and playing sports.

Group recitation of daily prayers is regarded by some Muslims as a necessity and by others only as a preference. But in a preliminary ruling, U.S. District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson concluded that “Mr. Lindh’s sincerely held religious beliefs require that group prayer participants are together and be able to see and hear each other.” What if he were in solitary confinement? We believe that the liberal judge presiding over this matter has completely disregarded a matter of extreme concern for us – and should be for the American public. We believe that this request through a law suit is excessive insofar as the Club Fed has already gone to other accommodations for these people and especially this person.

We furthermore believe that sacrificing one religion’s needs at the cost of others is ridiculously out of line. However none of this seems important to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson; who otherwise has not investigated the claims by Lindh.

Group recitation of daily prayers is regarded by some Muslims as a necessity yet by others only a matter of preference. What does the Muslim religion mandate? What does Islam dictate? Group prayer sessions present security concerns, unequal distribution of facilities interests, and Judge please remember that no matter what the intensity of a person’s religious beliefs are, is this prisoner asking for extraordinary treatment?

And yes we believe he is…We beg that you remember he is in custody!

American Muslim Judge Who Imposed Sharia in Pennsylvania Court

Infidel victim, Ernest Perce, has received 471 verifiable threats.

American District Court Judge, Mark Martin, in an American court espoused; “Our forefathers intended that we use the first amendment so that we could speak what’s on our mind, not piss off other cultures….. Islam is not just a religion; it’s their culture, their culture, the very essence, their very being. They pray five times a day, towards Mecca. To be a good Muslim before you die, you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you cannot because you are too ill, too elderly, whatever, you must make the attempt. Their greetings salum alaikum waliakum as-salm (as answered by voice), uh may god be with you. It is very common, their language, when they are speaking to each other, it is very common for them to say, uh Allah willing, this will happen. It’s they are so immersed in it.

And what you’ve done is you’ve completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I am a Muslim. I find it very offensive….. You are way outside your bounds of first amendment rights.”

Before going too far into this travesty we’d like to make it clear that although as some person states something that may be offensive to one does not necessitate that it is offensive to every person who hears what is said. Consider this is you will:

“Professor Zechariah Chaffee Jr., whose writing on the freedom of speech had such a profound effect on Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes insofar that Holmes divided the subject into to large categories. “The First Amendment” he wrote, “protects two kinds of interests in free speech. There is an individual interest, the need of many men to express their opinions on matters vital to them if life is to be worth living, and a social interest in the attainment of truth…”

Perhaps there is something especially American about the need for self-expression if life is to be worth living, as Professor Chafee put it.

Albert Einstein used the same phrase in describing what he found when he came to the United States. “From what I have seen of Americans” he wrote in 1944, “I think that life would not be worth living without this freedom of self-expression.”

All things being equal (and we soon shall see that they are not) this incident alone is why there needs to be anti-Sharia legislation immediately. Most of the following narrative is from ABC news (local in PA) with the strong hands and quill from one of this nation’s leading and foremost experts, Ms. Pam Geller.

It is from Ms. Geller’s website, Atlas Shrugs, that the majority of what you are about to read came from. We have no need and zero tolerance for any sitting judge to behave in this manner. So without further adieu here goes:

This is why we must have Sharia legislation in America, it is referred to as, Equal protection under the law. There is no “equal protection under the Sharia” for non-Muslims. Under Islam, Sharia supersedes the law of the land, any and every land.

Earlier today, I have been spending time researching while gathering as much information as possible on a matter reported on a Muslim judge who sided with a violent Muslim who beat up a parade-goer wearing a “Zombie Muhammad” costume while marching in a local Pennsylvania Halloween parade.

According to reports, the Parading Atheists of Central Pennsylvania (PACP) were marching in a Halloween parade in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, when a Muslim stormed out of the hometown crowd to assault one of the marching atheists who happened to be wearing a Zombie Muhammad costume.

An American judge in Pennsylvania ruled on the case and sided with the Muslim, and said that the victim would be put to death in Muslim societies for his “crime.”

But this case is worse than that. Ernest Perce, victim of a Muslim beating, may soon be spending time in jail because he released audio footage (above YouTube video) of a court proceeding. Aren’t court cases open to the public?

According to the description of a released video by Perce, Judge Mark Martin – the presiding judge of the court proceedings — is threatening to hold Perce in contempt of court for releasing recorded audio of the case even though, according to Perce, Perce was given permission to release the audio.

Commenting for this article, Perce notes that he released the video because he believes that he was treated unfairly and contends that his alleged assailant had been shown preferential treatment by Judge Mark Martin. Perce says he also released the video because he wants persons to evaluate the audio from the court proceeding.

But wait, it gets worse. The Judge refused to allow the video into evidence, and then said,

“All that aside I’ve got here basically.. I don’t want to say he said she said but I’ve got two sides of the story that are in conflict with each other.” And,

“The preponderance of, excuse me, the burden of proof… “ And,

“…he has not proven to me beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant is guilty of harassment, therefore I am going to dismiss the charge”

The Judge neglected to address the fact that the ignorance of the law does not justify an assault and that it was the responsibility of the defendant to familiarize himself with our laws. This is to say nothing of the judge counseling the defendant that it is also not acceptable for him to teach his children that it is acceptable to use violence in the defense of religious beliefs.

This is a travesty. Not only did Judge Martin completely ignore video evidence, but a Police Officer who was at the scene also testified on Mr. Perce’s behalf, to which the Judge also dismissed by saying the officer didn’t give an accurate account or doesn’t give it any weight. So much for law enforcement.

To view this video please click here.

Related articles

• American Muslim Judge Who Imposed Sharia in Pennslyvania Court Threatens to Jail Infidel Victim for Blasphemy – releasing recorded audio of the case (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)

Christianity and Islam…

A trial court in Iran has issued its final verdict, ordering a Christian pastor to be put to death for leaving Islam and converting to Christianity, according to sources close to the pastor and his legal team.
 Supporters fear Youcef Nadarkhani, a 34-year-old father of two who was arrested over two years ago on charges of apostasy, may now be executed at any time without prior warning, as death sentences in Iran may be carried out immediately or dragged out for years.

It is unclear whether Nadarkhani can appeal the execution order. In a separate, however related story we would like to include the following.

 “The world needs to stand up and say that a man cannot be put to death because of his faith,” said Jordan Sekulow, executive director of The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).

 “This one case is not just about one execution. We have been able to expose the system instead of just letting one man disappear, like so many other Christians have in the past.”
 It is also feared that Nadarkhani will be executed in retaliation as Iran endures crippling sanctions and international pressure in response to its nuclear agenda and rogue rhetoric. The number of executions in Iran has increased significantly in the last month.

The order to execute Nadarkhani came only days after lawmakers in Congress supported a resolution sponsored by Pennsylvania Rep. Joseph Pitts denouncing the apostasy charge and calling for his immediate release.

The United Nations Commission on Human Rights, considers the recanting of a person’s religion a human right legally protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

The Committee observes that the freedom to ‘have or to adopt’ a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one’s current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views…Furthermore, bars coercion that would impair the right to have or adopt a religion or belief, including the use of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers to adhere to their religious beliefs and congregations, to recant their religion or belief or to convert.

The order to execute Nadarkhani came only days after lawmakers in Congress supported a resolution sponsored by Pennsylvania Rep. Joseph Pitts denouncing the apostasy charge and calling for his immediate release.

“Iran has become more isolated because of their drive for nuclear weapons, and the fundamentalist government has stepped up persecution of religious minorities to deflect criticism,” Pitts, a Republican, told FoxNews.com. “The persecuted are their own citizens, whose only crime is practicing their faith.”

The ACLJ has been a major driving force in keeping Nadarkhani’s case in the international spotlight. Many other advocacy groups and human rights organizations also have mounted global campaigns and petitions against the Iranian government, and experts credit Nadarkhani’s international support for keeping him alive.

Nadarkhani was arrested in October 2009 and was tried and found guilty of apostasy by a lower court in Gilan, a province in Rasht. He was then given verbal notification of an impending death-by-hanging sentence.

His lawyers appealed the decision under the premise that Nadarkhani was never a Muslim at the age of majority, a practicing Muslim from the age of adulthood, 15 in Islamic law, to age 19, which was when he converted.

The lower court then ruled that Nadarkhani had not practiced Islam during his adult life but still upheld the apostasy charge because he was born into a Muslim family. Sounds like a rule change!

The next time one is thinking about religious freedom or the 1st Amendment to our Constitution, please mentally thank a Founder and realize that others are not so fortunate.

For further reading please click here, thank you.

 

 

What’s next in religion..according to the Obama Regime?

You know there doesn’t need to be problems with religion in this country. All one need to do is to look out to your sources or reading material and look at who is making the most noise and chances are, given the rate of reasonable probabilty it will be that group or religion that is making the most bull squat.

If there were anything I would hope that we could do as a nation – united and collectively – is to pass some legislation that limits the amount of damages one receives from some of the most ridiculous cases that never should have made it into a court room. We are not advocating changing or even altering the U.S. Constitution or the First Amendment that specifically uses 14 words that mentions the notion of religion.

However, we come across two stories that all aside from Atheists’, Muslims, Islam, Sikhs, or even homosexuals suing Christians for whatever reasons should be placed into an entirely new category. The United States of America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles and if this is news to you or if you have a problem with it, then don’t hate the messenger, just take some quality time looking into precisely what the Founders said. Who was their guidance? Where did they receive those unalienable rights? Why do we “In God We Trust,” on our currency?

Help us all make sense of this scenario. There are no druids at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, CO this year. Well then what about next year? According to the Los Angeles Times, who provides this story about the accommodations for “earth-based” religions, such as pagans, druids, witches, Wiccans, and various other Native American religions?

The U.S. taxpayer has just built an $80,000 “outpost worship center” for druids and the other aforementioned religions on Academy grounds, a hilltop circle of boulders complete with propane fire pit.

“It is very nice to have our own space,” says Cadet 1st Class Nicole Johnson, describing the mini-Stonehenge. Johnson, who “became a pagan” after entering the Academy, is one of the only three pagans in a 4300 cadet enrollment.

To be able to minister to this trio, the Air Force hired two witches, who help the cadets celebrate the winter solstice and “regularly cast spells” according to The Times, “which they say is not so different from offering prayer.”

Here’s the contrast and compare: On the morning of June 6, 1944, as Allied forces were landing on the beaches in Normandy, also known as “D-Day” President Roosevelt went to the airwaves and led the nation in a prayer for God’s blessing and protection on U.S. troops. From coast to coast, the President’s voice resounded, “Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity. Lead them straight and true; give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith. They will need Thy blessings.”

Without question it is a moving prayer that also noted, “some will never return. Embrace these, Father, and receive them. Thy heroic servants, into Thy Kingdom.

However, if the Obama Regime has its way, you won’t find these words showcased at the World War II Memorial in Washington D.C. A measure to display the D-Day prayer just got the proverbial thumbs down, according to Fox News.

And get this – had I’d not seen this in writing I wouldn’t have believed it – Obama’s Bureau of Land Management Director, Robert Abbey, claimed the prayer would “dilute this elegant memorial’s central message and its ability to clearly convey that message to move, educate, and inspire its many visitors.”

Mr. Abbey definitely should write his own reasons and not those of his bosses’ press corps. What better message is there to move, whilst educating and inspiring its many visitors? (Please click here for the entire article.)