Three issues we all should take notice of…
Three Issues We all should take notice of…
Senators and representatives won’t have their own pay cut as part of the “sequester.” The cuts could still hit close to home for Congress. As the rest of the federal government prepares for furloughs, layoffs and sweeping budget cuts caused by the “sequester,” the people who could prevent the cuts are the ones whose paychecks are protected: members of Congress.
The 27th Amendment to the constitution — intended to prevent members of Congress from voting themselves a pay raise — also prohibits them from taking a pay cut until after the next election.
Congress will feel the pain in other ways. Members’ office budgets, committee staff and leadership offices will all see the same across-the-board cuts as any other discretionary, non-defense spending.
Other legislative branch functions — the Capitol Visitor Center, the Library of Congress’s Books for the Blind program, even the Capitol Police — would take cuts of about 9%, according to a report from the Office of Management and Budget.
In the House, each representative gets an annual office budget of about $1.5 million — more for members from expensive and faraway districts.
Some congressional offices may feel the cuts more deeply than others. A USA TODAY analysis of 2011 congressional spending showed that 40% of House members had spent more than 90% of their office budgets — and Congress has cut its own budgets by about 8% since then. Additional cuts imposed by the sequester could force these offices to lay off staff or implement other cost-cutting strategies.
In 2011, Congress passed — and President Obama signed into law — the Budget Control Act, which required the across-the-board cuts of $1.2 trillion as a way to motivate lawmakers to find some other way of reducing the nation’s budget deficit. They didn’t. We’ll say they didn’t…not even close.
Much of the $85 billion cost savings this year will come through furloughs, the administration has said. As many as 800,000 civilian employees in the Defense Department will have to take 22 days of unpaid leave before Oct. 1. Active-duty military and civilian defense employees in combat zones are exempt, as are senior political appointees in the Obama administration who don’t fall under federal civil service rules.
The Executive Office of the President is subject to the sequester, but White House spokesman Jay Carney — while warning of the dire effects of agency cuts — declined to elaborate on how the presidency would be impacted. Again, the president’s salary wouldn’t be cut.
Immigration News
We found the guts of this story from USA Today. Interesting read from subscriber’s of Facebook.
Legal immigrants like me had to stand in a long queue for quite some time to get a green card and then citizenship while paying taxes and being a good citizen. The so-called illegal folks can do the same.
Circumventing the process for folks who broke the law knowingly is rewarding bad behavior. It’s also a slap on the face for legal immigrants who followed the laws to become citizens.
Manoj Nampoothiry
No pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. The federal government should do its job and enforce our immigration laws. Deport all illegal aliens, secure the border and fine anyone who hires an illegal alien.
Immigration reform should change the laws so that anyone who hires an illegal immigrant will be liable for the cost of deporting the employee and his or her family.
Charles Edward Brown
There are a lot of rational proposals on immigration reform, which is needed.
It would be nice if Democrats and Republicans could come together on this, and it looks as if that is possible. Let’s get it done.
Jerome Mansfield
Letter to the editor:
Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., was quoted in your article “Some attending Obama speech are in the U.S. illegally” saying of his State of the Union guest, Gabino Sanchez, who is facing deportation, “What do you say to Gabino’s 7-year-old son and his 2-year-old son?”
What you say to them is, “Your father broke the law, and in our country there are consequences for people who break the law.” We send many citizens to jail every day, which causes great hardship for their children. Why would it be any different for children of illegal immigrants?
Oops! That’s only two for now of the original three issues. The third issue is about “An evening with the Oscars” but it is comprehensive with original source material, experiences, and quotes from those in the industry. In short that article is a post all by itself and we hope to run it tomorrow. Thank you!
Rate this:
Recent Posts
Categories
Border Security
Blogroll
- A View from the Right
- Against Amnesty
- Alexander Hamilton Patriot
- Bucket List Publications
- Coalition Against Illegal Immigration
- Discover the Networks
- fredricksonblog
- georgesblog
- Judicial Watch
- Michelle Malkin
- NumbersUSA
- OneOldVet
- Overlawyered
- Pew Research Center
- Riehl World View
- Stand up for America
- The Mad Jewess
- The Wandering Heretic
- Wordpress.com
- WordPress.org
- yeah right…
- Zeal Blog
Archives
Onemorecup Supports
Public Service Announcement
A lovely honor
Immigration, DOJ, ICE, & DHS
Iran begins Internet crackdown, prepares to launch “halal” Internet
All the better to monitor its citizens against thought crime: "the residents of Iran must give their name along with their father's name, telephone number, address and national ID to log in to access internet."
How about that for name and password?
Hey! C’mon over for a game!
Recommended Reading
Original Meanings, Jack N. Rakove
Something that will Surprise the World, Susan Dunn
Constitional Choas, Judge Andrew Napolitano
Jefferson and Civil Liberties: The Darker Side, Leonard Levy
OUTRAGE! Dick Morris
Common Sense:... Glenn Beck
Infamous Scribblers Eric Burns
Getting America Right Feulner and Wilson
The Spirit of Modern Republicanism Thomas L. Pangle
The Politically Incorrect Guide to The Founding Fathers Brion McClanahan, Ph.D.
What Would the Founders Do? Richard Brookhiser
The Unfinished Journey William Chafe
Responsibility

What do you think?












Another disturbing exemption is USPHS will NOT be furloughed. USPHS actually get a large chunk of money each month for housing that is federally funded…why can’t they pay for their own housing?? Unbelievable that our dept of defense will be getting furloughed for all of their sacrifices and USPHS will not be furloughed at all.
Dear BW:
I completely agree with you! As far as we’re concerned no part of any gov’t funded agency should be spared. As for your other questions the monthly allotment they receive must be similar to BAS & BHS. I was just reading where these folks are actually listed as “The Seventh Service” along with the US Marine Corps, US Army, US Navy, US Air Force, and US Coast Guard which one am I missing? Oh yeah…NOAA Commissioned Corps.