Vive la France!
French leaders, once poised to pass a same-sex marriage bill, are meeting opposition to their efforts.
An estimated 350,000 proponents of marriage rallied near the Eiffel Tower last Sunday, urging the government to retain marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The protest was one of France’s largest in decades, according to news outlets.
The effort is a troubling move for the country, which is facing its own deteriorating marriage culture. Redefining marriage would intensify the confusion plaguing France over the purpose and public nature of marriage.
The rallying cries in France, much like in America, are turning the discussion to the needs of children, not just the desires of adults.
Government recognizes marriage because it is an institution that is fundamental to society’s stability. Government—whether French or American—should not obscure the truth about marriage by accepting a revisionist view of marriage, which sees marriage as primarily about emotional bonds or legal privileges. In redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships, government would weaken marital norms, which would further delink childbearing from marriage and hurt spouses and children—especially the most vulnerable. It would deny a mother or father to a child as a matter of policy. Citizens would also lose more of their freedom of religion and conscience.
Sadly, reports indicate that the French government is ignoring the people’s voice, insisting that it will move ahead with their proposal to introduce legislation this month in hopes of passage in June.
As France debates marriage, America is having its own legal and cultural debate about marriage in the shadow of the Supreme Court’s consideration of the issue.
We proudly salute the French people who have come to the realization that in order to establish and maintain society the sense of children and their needs are far more important than the wanton desires of adults. It appears that the French are living within the world of the great minds, thinkers, and philosophers that have been the topic of study for collegiate coursework here in the USA.
In addition, the multi-faith approach including Christians, Jews, and Muslims are demonstrating their true freedom of religion and conscience rather than have a hedonistic and money grubbing spend thrift government making the decisions for them.
Public Service Announcement
A lovely honor
Immigration, DOJ, ICE, & DHS
All the better to monitor its citizens against thought crime: "the residents of Iran must give their name along with their father's name, telephone number, address and national ID to log in to access internet."
How about that for name and password?
Hey! C’mon over for a game!
Original Meanings, Jack N. Rakove
Something that will Surprise the World, Susan Dunn
Constitional Choas, Judge Andrew Napolitano
Jefferson and Civil Liberties: The Darker Side, Leonard Levy
OUTRAGE! Dick Morris
Common Sense:... Glenn Beck
Infamous Scribblers Eric Burns
Getting America Right Feulner and Wilson
The Spirit of Modern Republicanism Thomas L. Pangle
The Politically Incorrect Guide to The Founding Fathers Brion McClanahan, Ph.D.
What Would the Founders Do? Richard Brookhiser
The Unfinished Journey William Chafe
What do you think?