Political correctness in the military?

In Memorium

In Memoriam

We have a request: Please, we implore you, have a read of the “Political Correct” tab at the top of the homepage or if you’re feeling especially adventurous today, then rush immediately to what is quickly becoming the most read article on this blog: Dismantling Language…Why? 
As we have stated with an over-preponderance of justifiable facts that the notion is brought forth when one engages in ‘politically correct speech’ there exists the constant changing of names, labels, and identifiers for whatever reason – the backlash of doing so causes a slow dismantling of language of a society, ergo, the actual dismantling of the society itself.
And folks this is happening in America right now as we get ready to roll with this article. Consider if you will, that those who refuse to assimilate fully into the ‘host culture’ are bringing with them certain norms, traditions, and beliefs from their previous ‘home cultures.’ This is no more evident that with those who simply refuse to learn or even attempt to learn English!
Now if not learning the ‘host’ language of one’s adopted homeland, moreover, uniting with ‘protected classes’ of people who claim discrimination for not doing the simplest requirement of decency. We have a couple of examples of how being politically correct with language is already a detriment to America. Yet first we need to ask why it is so important that entire meanings of words and the norms of a society be changed to accommodate those who refuse to honor a place that gives them so much?
It should come as no surprise to anyone who reads or catches the news on an infrequent basis to know that many experts are now alleging that an “overly politically correct” military may be at the root cause for this Army Major Nidal Hasan to go completely off the rails and murder people without mercy. So what does this claim have to do with the notion of political correctness?
Simply this – as a society that believes it is inappropriate to even mention anything about being Muslim (the “M” word) for fear of reprisals or direct special interest group lawsuits – and to be compliant with all of the rubbish that surrounds equal employment opportunity (EEO) and “protected classes” acts – rather than to simply deal with it even our own military has begun its denial.
We would like to espouse these ideals that have come from those classes: In the LGBT community why do you think that same-sex marriage is meeting a rise in resistance? Why do you think there is a rise in resistance for “don’t ask, don’t tell” policies? Moreover, if anyone with a lick of common sense examines why, or, the causal effects of discrimination – we’d like to suggest to you: How do cultural stereotypes originate? Is it possible that perhaps predicated upon behavior a person or protected class of people exhibits just may be inherent in those very affects?
 
squiggly_blue 

One Response to “Political correctness in the military?”

  1. Political correctness in the military part 2 « American Age Says:

    [...] simply is not assisting those who need protection in this country. (Please see previous articles by clicking here.) Sixty-three percent (63%) of U.S. voters say political correctness prevented the military from [...]

Leave a Reply