Does everyone have the right to live..?

Consider the source!

We left off the last article with a ‘working definition’ for the word life. There is a reason for this you see. It’s called special interest groups, money, and the government. Each one of these entities has their own vested interests as to why they have clouded the very issue of life with such profane oddities such as “viability.”

Viability in this instance means the reasonable rate of probability that a human fetus could live outside of the mother’s body and at what time interval; furthermore, in their infinite wisdom in order to get the legislation of almost 40 years ago done they had to ‘time-fix’ when a person is alive.

Obviously in the rush to get something passed, our fearless elected officials, together with their special interest groups, lobbyists, and other organizations, did not look to the future (sound familiar?) for further advances in medical technology, or technology in general. We believe that there is a motive behind every decision that our legislator’s make. This is one from long ago from a person far greater than I will ever be:

“Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.” (Thomas Jefferson, scientist, philosopher, university founder & president.)

The following is a portion of a comment we received from a person who has forgotten more than most of us will ever know; moreover, we have invited him to write here at The Thinker whenever he wishes:

“Why? Because powerful abortionists – those who legislate in its favor, the blood-money abortion industries, and the people who actually do the abortions, have shown for the past 30 years, in the face of glaring evidence, that they don’t CARE if it is life that they are killing. They don’t care! Why do you think the same people go through all the trouble to keep the Ten Commandments as far out of their sight and the public’s sight as possible? After all, such commandments as “Do not murder” and “Do no commit adultery” seem to get in the way of their “freedom to choose.” (Hercules Mulligan)

Wow! Talk about a realist! When one considers the above referenced 100 words the motus operandi and inherent scheming becomes far too obvious. Take one or two invaluable ingredients out of the stew, then add in some real dung, and what have you got? That’s right…”Dung stew”; Now on to some exciting new matters:

Utah: Through two bills, the Legislature is about to rewrite portions of Utah abortion law. Because both would further insert the state into medical decisions made by a doctor. (Article here.)

North Dakota as previously mentioned with a huge hat-tip to a fellow FFQF partner, akaGaGa, inspired us to do some deeper research. Recently the North Dakota legislature recently passed a bill determining:

The rights of unborn children gained a victory in North Dakota on Tuesday, as the state House of Representatives voted to recognize the personhood of all human beings, from conception.

“For purposes of interpretation of the constitution and laws of North Dakota, it is the intent of the legislative assembly that an individual, a person, when the context indicates that a reference to an individual is intended, or a human being includes any organism with the genome of homo sapiens,” reads part of The Personhood of Children Act (House Resolution 1572). (Story here)

Montana just as I was typing the press release started flashing from the great State of Montana where the state Senate just passed the Personhood Amendment, SB 406 stating:

SB 406, which defines person for the purposes of application of inalienable rights, states, “All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights…person means a human being at all stages of human development of life, including the state of fertilization or conception, regardless of age, health, level of functioning, or condition of dependency.” (Story here)

Consider those special interest groups and the U.S. government that all have a stake in abortion: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA), National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) Pro-CHOICE America, National Right to Life, Pro-Life, Personhood U.S.A., and the list is endless. Consider if you will that these “pro-choice” groups are going as far back as the Equal Rights Amendment 1968 (ERA) which was never ratified to base some of their argument!

More on the way…